Re: AW: [HACKERS] pg_index.indislossy

[Tom Lane]

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Nathan Myers) writes:
> Seriously, "indislossy" is a singularly poor name for a predicate.

Perhaps, but it fits with the existing naming conventions for Postgres
catalog columns.  Unless we want to indulge in wholesale renaming of
the system's catalog columns (and break an awful lot of applications)
I'd resist any name for a pg_index column that's not of the form "indFOO".

                        regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?

http://www.postgresql.org/search.mpl