"David E. Wheeler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Jun 5, 2008, at 11:28, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
>> What would you want postgresql to choose in this case.
> I was thinking that the ::text should be cast to ::lctext, as that's
> how `'a'::lctext = 'a'` works, but I keep going back and forth in my
> mind. Maybe 'a'::lctext should not equal 'A'::text.
It seems to me that lctext is sort of like a more-constrained version
of text (like a domain), which suggests that the lctext -> text
direction can be implicit but the other direction should not be.
Moreover, if you don't have lctext -> text be implicit then you
will find that none of the non-comparison text functions work on
lctext except with a cast; which is not the place you want to be.
I concur with Martijn that having both directions implicit is a
Bad Idea.
BTW, I would encourage you to think of this project as citext version 2,
rather than inventing a new name for the datatype. All you'll
accomplish with that is make it hard for users of citext to transition.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
