Robert Treat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> and i'm sure no one is against that idea, but you're never going to be able
> to
> match the performance of just avoiding the check.
We'll never be able to match the performance of not having transactions,
either, but the community has never for a moment considered having a
"no transactions" mode.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
