Nathan Myers writes: > When the system is too heavily loaded (however measured), any further > login attempts will fail. What I suggested is, instead of the > postmaster accept()ing the connection, why not leave the connection > attempt in the queue until we can afford a back end to handle it? Because the new connection might be a cancel request. -- Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://funkturm.homeip.net/~peter ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: SOMAXCONN (was Re: Solaris source code) Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: SOMAXCONN (was Re: Solaris source code) Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: SOMAXCONN (was Re: Solaris source code) Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: SOMAXCONN (was Re: Solaris source code) Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: SOMAXCONN (was Re: Solaris source code) Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: SOMAXCONN (was Re: Solaris source ... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: SOMAXCONN (was Re: Solaris source ... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: SOMAXCONN (was Re: Solaris source code) Nathan Myers
- [HACKERS] Re: SOMAXCONN (was Re: Solaris source code) Nathan Myers
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: SOMAXCONN (was Re: Solaris source code) Peter Eisentraut
- [HACKERS] Re: SOMAXCONN (was Re: Solaris source code) mlw
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: SOMAXCONN (was Re: Solaris source code) Tom Lane
- [HACKERS] Re: SOMAXCONN (was Re: Solaris source code) mlw
- [HACKERS] Re: SOMAXCONN (was Re: Solaris source code) Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: SOMAXCONN (was Re: Solaris source code) Nathan Myers