On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 9:32 AM, Magnus Hagander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yes. > > As in the cygwin build does build. Nobody really has verified if the fix > is needed there. But frankly, if you are likely to care about the > effects of this issue, you won't be running cygwin anyway. It's mostly a > dead platform for postgresql anyway, AFAICS we only keep it building for > legacy compatibility. Once it starts taking lots of resources to keep > building (which it doesn't now), I think we should just drop it instead...
FWIW, the most recent packages from Cygwin themselves are 8.2.5. -- Dave Page EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
