"Jeffrey Baker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I guess nobody has any interest in my proposal, only in the departure of my > described experience from expected behavior :-(
Well, we certainly should try to understand the unexpected behavior in detail before we consider solutions. Per Sir A.C. Doyle, it is a capital mistake to theorize in advance of the data. (It's probably also worth noting that this community's historical interest has not been in read-only or even read-mostly data. We'd not be willing to pay all that MVCC overhead if we thought we were just a warehouse of static data. If that's what you want, maybe you need some other DBMS.) regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers