Re: [HACKERS] Re: Encrypting pg_shadow passwords

[Nathan Myers]

On Wed, Jul 11, 2001 at 01:24:53PM +1000, Michael Samuel wrote:
> The crypt authentication currently used offers _no_ security. ...
> Of course, SSL *if done correctly with certificate verification* is the
> correct fix.  If no certificate verification is done, you fall victim to
> a man-in-the-middle attack.

It seems worth noting here that you don't have to depend on
SSL authentication; PG can do its own authentication over SSL
and avoid the man-in-the-middle attack that way.  

Of course, PG would have to do its authentication properly, e.g. 
with the HMAC method.  That seems better than depending on SSL 
authentication, because SSL certification seems to be universally
misconfigured.

Nathan Myers
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster