On Fri, 2008-06-27 at 17:50 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Simon Riggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > On Thu, 2008-06-26 at 13:42 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > >> It might be possible to treat "ignore the RHS" as a join strategy and > >> try to apply it while forming join relations, which would be late enough > >> to have all the needed info available. > > > Oh, actually have a join node that is a no-op, with a path cost of zero? > > Not even that: just return the best path(s) for the LHS as the paths for > the joinrel.
Much neater. Cool. -- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
