At 2008-06-30 13:17:42 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > It seems that the most efficient way to communicate with the > DB would be through PQexecParams(), which avoids the whole > bytea-encoding issues.
Yes. > Does it become $10 or ${10} or $(10) or is it simply not possible > te reference more than nine parameters this way? $10 etc. > - Say that the SELECT returns 1000 rows of 100MB each, is there a way > to avoid PQexecParams() from wanting to allocate 1000*100MB = 100GB Use a cursor and keep executing FETCH. -- ams -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers