On 7/8/08, Joshua D. Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 2008-07-08 at 10:21 +0100, Simon Riggs wrote: > > On Sat, 2008-06-28 at 16:36 +0300, Marko Kreen wrote: > > > I very much like PL/Proxy and support your vision. Including the > > features of PL/Proxy in core seems like a great idea to me. > > > > Adding this feature for tables would be interesting with Hot Standby, > > since it would allow you to offload SELECT statements onto the standby > > automatically. > > > > This would be considerably easier to integrate than text search was. > > > First let me say that I too enjoy PL/Proxy quite a bit. However, I don't > think it needs to be in core. I wouldn't mind seeing it in contrib (or > better yet modules/ should we ever get around to that).
I'm not against contrib/ considering that the docs are now nicely integrated, but then, whats the difference between src/pl/ and contrib/? OTOH, if you argue LANGUAGE plproxy vs. CREATE REMOTE FUNCTION, then thats different matter. It seems to be we should do REMOTE FUNCTION after, not before REMOTE TABLE as the table/view implementation needs to dictate the actual details. -- marko -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
