On Mon, 14 Jul 2008, Tom Lane wrote:
Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Tom Lane wrote:
Isn't the vacuum_delay_point() good enough?
But that's in the outer loop ... I mean here:
You'd need one heckuva lot of lexemes in a tsvector to make that
Tom, I like the 'heckuva' word (in russian we have sort of), but would you
please sometimes put in footnote a translation to a regular english for
education :)
important. Do we have CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS() in any other loops
over tsvector contents? I kinda doubt it ...
(I have no real objection to adding CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS there,
I'm just questioning the value.)
regards, tom lane
Regards,
Oleg
_____________________________________________________________
Oleg Bartunov, Research Scientist, Head of AstroNet (www.astronet.ru),
Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Moscow University, Russia
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.sai.msu.su/~megera/
phone: +007(495)939-16-83, +007(495)939-23-83
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
