Tom Lane wrote: > >> What's wrong with 64-bit oids (except extra 4bytes)? > > > Portability, mostly. > > Oh, there's one other small problem: breaking the on-the-wire protocol. So 8-byte-OID is for PostgreSQL 8? :-) -- Alessio F. Bragadini [EMAIL PROTECTED] APL Financial Services http://village.albourne.com Nicosia, Cyprus phone: +357-2-755750 "It is more complicated than you think" -- The Eighth Networking Truth from RFC 1925 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: OID wraparound (was Re: [HACKERS] pg_depend) Bruce Momjian
- Re: OID wraparound (was Re: [HACKERS] pg_depend) Hiroshi Inoue
- Re: OID wraparound (was Re: [HACKERS] pg_depend) Bruce Momjian
- Re: OID wraparound (was Re: [HACKERS] pg_depend) Hiroshi Inoue
- Re: OID wraparound (was Re: [HACKERS] pg_depend) Tom Lane
- Re: OID wraparound (was Re: [HACKERS] pg_depend) Tom Lane
- Re: OID wraparound (was Re: [HACKERS] pg_depend) Bruce Momjian
- Re: OID wraparound (was Re: [HACKERS] pg_depend) Tatsuo Ishii
- Re: OID wraparound (was Re: [HACKERS] pg_depend) Tom Lane
- Re: OID wraparound (was Re: [HACKERS] pg_depend) Tom Lane
- Re: OID wraparound (was Re: [HACKERS] pg_depend) Alessio Bragadini
- Re: OID wraparound (was Re: [HACKERS] pg_depend) Hiroshi Inoue
- Re: OID wraparound (was Re: [HACKERS] pg_depend) Tom Lane
- Re: OID wraparound (was Re: [HACKERS] pg_depend) Lamar Owen
- Re: OID wraparound (was Re: [HACKERS] pg_depend) Ashley Cambrell
- Re: OID wraparound (was Re: [HACKERS] pg_depend) Tom Lane
- Re: OID wraparound (was Re: [HACKERS] pg_depend) Philip Warner
- Re: OID wraparound (was Re: [HACKERS] pg_depend) Hiroshi Inoue
- Re: OID wraparound (was Re: [HACKERS] pg_depend) Tom Lane
- Re: OID wraparound (was Re: [HACKERS] pg_depend) Hiroshi Inoue