I've fixed the patch just now. It works and pass the regression test ;-)
Here is the new patch. I'll keep the hash code in order and use
binary search in a later version soon.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/hash/hash.c b/src/backend/access/hash/hash.c
index 6a5c000..1a8dc75 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/hash/hash.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/hash/hash.c
@@ -129,7 +129,11 @@ hashbuildCallback(Relation index,
IndexTuple itup;
/* form an index tuple and point it at the heap tuple */
+#ifdef HASHVALUE_ONLY
+ itup = _hash_form_tuple(index, values,isnull);
+#else
itup = index_form_tuple(RelationGetDescr(index), values, isnull);
+#endif
itup->t_tid = htup->t_self;
/* Hash indexes don't index nulls, see notes in hashinsert */
@@ -171,7 +175,12 @@ hashinsert(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
IndexTuple itup;
/* generate an index tuple */
+#ifdef HASHVALUE_ONLY
+ itup = _hash_form_tuple(rel, values, isnull);
+#else
itup = index_form_tuple(RelationGetDescr(rel), values, isnull);
+#endif
+
itup->t_tid = *ht_ctid;
/*
@@ -212,7 +221,11 @@ hashgettuple(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
bool res;
/* Hash indexes are never lossy (at the moment anyway) */
- scan->xs_recheck = false;
+#ifdef HASHVALUE_ONLY
+ scan->xs_recheck = true;
+#else
+ scan->xs_recheck = false;
+#endif
/*
* We hold pin but not lock on current buffer while outside the hash AM.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/hash/hashinsert.c
b/src/backend/access/hash/hashinsert.c
index 3eb226a..0800006 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/hash/hashinsert.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/hash/hashinsert.c
@@ -52,9 +52,15 @@ _hash_doinsert(Relation rel, IndexTuple itup)
*/
if (rel->rd_rel->relnatts != 1)
elog(ERROR, "hash indexes support only one index key");
+#ifdef HASHVALUE_ONLY
+ datum = index_getattr(itup, 1, _create_hash_desc(), &isnull);
+ Assert(!isnull);
+ hashkey = DatumGetUInt32(datum);
+#else
datum = index_getattr(itup, 1, RelationGetDescr(rel), &isnull);
Assert(!isnull);
hashkey = _hash_datum2hashkey(rel, datum);
+#endif
/* compute item size too */
itemsz = IndexTupleDSize(*itup);
diff --git a/src/backend/access/hash/hashpage.c
b/src/backend/access/hash/hashpage.c
index b0b5874..bba64c4 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/hash/hashpage.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/hash/hashpage.c
@@ -785,7 +785,12 @@ _hash_splitbucket(Relation rel,
OffsetNumber omaxoffnum;
Page opage;
Page npage;
- TupleDesc itupdesc = RelationGetDescr(rel);
+ TupleDesc itupdesc;
+#ifdef HASHVALUE_ONLY
+ itupdesc = _create_hash_desc();
+#else
+ itupdesc = RelationGetDescr(rel);
+#endif
/*
* It should be okay to simultaneously write-lock pages from each
bucket,
@@ -854,9 +859,13 @@ _hash_splitbucket(Relation rel,
itup = (IndexTuple) PageGetItem(opage, PageGetItemId(opage,
ooffnum));
datum = index_getattr(itup, 1, itupdesc, &null);
Assert(!null);
-
+#ifdef HASHVALUE_ONLY
+ bucket = _hash_hashkey2bucket(DatumGetUInt32(datum),
+
maxbucket, highmask, lowmask);
+#else
bucket = _hash_hashkey2bucket(_hash_datum2hashkey(rel, datum),
maxbucket, highmask, lowmask);
+#endif
if (bucket == nbucket)
{
diff --git a/src/backend/access/hash/hashsearch.c
b/src/backend/access/hash/hashsearch.c
index 258526b..5211e67 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/hash/hashsearch.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/hash/hashsearch.c
@@ -178,6 +178,7 @@ _hash_first(IndexScanDesc scan, ScanDirection dir)
hashkey = _hash_datum2hashkey_type(rel, cur->sk_argument,
cur->sk_subtype);
+ so->hashso_sk_hash = hashkey;
/*
* Acquire shared split lock so we can compute the target bucket safely
* (see README).
diff --git a/src/backend/access/hash/hashutil.c
b/src/backend/access/hash/hashutil.c
index 41e2eef..81c6829 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/hash/hashutil.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/hash/hashutil.c
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@
#include "executor/execdebug.h"
#include "storage/bufmgr.h"
#include "utils/lsyscache.h"
-
+#include "catalog/pg_type.h"
/*
* _hash_checkqual -- does the index tuple satisfy the scan conditions?
@@ -28,16 +28,31 @@
bool
_hash_checkqual(IndexScanDesc scan, IndexTuple itup)
{
- TupleDesc tupdesc = RelationGetDescr(scan->indexRelation);
+ TupleDesc tupdesc;
ScanKey key = scan->keyData;
int scanKeySize = scan->numberOfKeys;
+ Datum datum;
+ bool isNull;
+ HashScanOpaque so = scan->opaque;
IncrIndexProcessed();
+#ifdef HASHVALUE_ONLY
+ tupdesc = _create_hash_desc();
+ datum = index_getattr(itup,
+ key->sk_attno,
+ tupdesc,
+ &isNull);
+ if( so->hashso_sk_hash != DatumGetUInt32(datum) )
+ return false;
+ key++;
+ scanKeySize--;
+#else
+ tupdesc = RelationGetDescr(scan->indexRelation);
+#endif
+
while (scanKeySize > 0)
{
- Datum datum;
- bool isNull;
Datum test;
datum = index_getattr(itup,
@@ -222,3 +237,31 @@ hashoptions(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
PG_RETURN_BYTEA_P(result);
PG_RETURN_NULL();
}
+
+/*
+ * _create_hash_desc - create a hash TupleDesc
+ *
+ * the TupleDesc is with int32 attribute, not uint32 because we've no
pg_type with UINT4OID
+ */
+TupleDesc _create_hash_desc()
+{
+ TupleDesc tupdesc = CreateTemplateTupleDesc(1, false);
+ TupleDescInitEntry(tupdesc, 1, "hashcode", INT4OID, -1, 0);
+ return tupdesc;
+}
+
+/*
+ * _hash_form_tuple - form a tuple with hash code only
+ */
+IndexTuple _hash_form_tuple(Relation rel, Datum* values, bool* isnull)
+{
+ TupleDesc hashdesc;
+ IndexTuple itup;
+ uint32 hashkey;
+
+ hashdesc = _create_hash_desc();
+ hashkey = _hash_datum2hashkey(rel, values[0]);
+ values[0] = UInt32GetDatum(hashkey);
+ itup = index_form_tuple(hashdesc, values, isnull);
+ return itup;
+}
diff --git a/src/include/access/hash.h b/src/include/access/hash.h
index ab0824d..141f1fc 100644
--- a/src/include/access/hash.h
+++ b/src/include/access/hash.h
@@ -100,6 +100,8 @@ typedef struct HashScanOpaqueData
/* Current and marked position of the scan */
ItemPointerData hashso_curpos;
ItemPointerData hashso_mrkpos;
+ /* Hash value of the scan key */
+ uint32 hashso_sk_hash;
} HashScanOpaqueData;
typedef HashScanOpaqueData *HashScanOpaque;
@@ -227,6 +229,10 @@ typedef HashMetaPageData *HashMetaPage;
*/
#define HASHPROC 1
+/*
+ * store hash value only in the bucket
+ */
+#define HASHVALUE_ONLY
/* public routines */
@@ -330,6 +336,8 @@ extern Bucket _hash_hashkey2bucket(uint32 hashkey,
uint32 maxbucket,
uint32 highmask, uint32 lowmask);
extern uint32 _hash_log2(uint32 num);
extern void _hash_checkpage(Relation rel, Buffer buf, int flags);
+extern TupleDesc _create_hash_desc();
+extern IndexTuple _hash_form_tuple(Relation rel, Datum* values, bool* isnull);
/* hash.c */
extern void hash_redo(XLogRecPtr lsn, XLogRecord *record);
--
Best Regards,
Xiao Meng
DKERC, Harbin Institute of Technology, China
Gtalk: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://xiaomeng.yo2.cn
diff --git a/src/backend/access/hash/hash.c b/src/backend/access/hash/hash.c
index 6a5c000..1a8dc75 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/hash/hash.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/hash/hash.c
@@ -129,7 +129,11 @@ hashbuildCallback(Relation index,
IndexTuple itup;
/* form an index tuple and point it at the heap tuple */
+#ifdef HASHVALUE_ONLY
+ itup = _hash_form_tuple(index, values,isnull);
+#else
itup = index_form_tuple(RelationGetDescr(index), values, isnull);
+#endif
itup->t_tid = htup->t_self;
/* Hash indexes don't index nulls, see notes in hashinsert */
@@ -171,7 +175,12 @@ hashinsert(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
IndexTuple itup;
/* generate an index tuple */
+#ifdef HASHVALUE_ONLY
+ itup = _hash_form_tuple(rel, values, isnull);
+#else
itup = index_form_tuple(RelationGetDescr(rel), values, isnull);
+#endif
+
itup->t_tid = *ht_ctid;
/*
@@ -212,7 +221,11 @@ hashgettuple(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
bool res;
/* Hash indexes are never lossy (at the moment anyway) */
- scan->xs_recheck = false;
+#ifdef HASHVALUE_ONLY
+ scan->xs_recheck = true;
+#else
+ scan->xs_recheck = false;
+#endif
/*
* We hold pin but not lock on current buffer while outside the hash AM.
diff --git a/src/backend/access/hash/hashinsert.c b/src/backend/access/hash/hashinsert.c
index 3eb226a..0800006 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/hash/hashinsert.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/hash/hashinsert.c
@@ -52,9 +52,15 @@ _hash_doinsert(Relation rel, IndexTuple itup)
*/
if (rel->rd_rel->relnatts != 1)
elog(ERROR, "hash indexes support only one index key");
+#ifdef HASHVALUE_ONLY
+ datum = index_getattr(itup, 1, _create_hash_desc(), &isnull);
+ Assert(!isnull);
+ hashkey = DatumGetUInt32(datum);
+#else
datum = index_getattr(itup, 1, RelationGetDescr(rel), &isnull);
Assert(!isnull);
hashkey = _hash_datum2hashkey(rel, datum);
+#endif
/* compute item size too */
itemsz = IndexTupleDSize(*itup);
diff --git a/src/backend/access/hash/hashpage.c b/src/backend/access/hash/hashpage.c
index b0b5874..bba64c4 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/hash/hashpage.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/hash/hashpage.c
@@ -785,7 +785,12 @@ _hash_splitbucket(Relation rel,
OffsetNumber omaxoffnum;
Page opage;
Page npage;
- TupleDesc itupdesc = RelationGetDescr(rel);
+ TupleDesc itupdesc;
+#ifdef HASHVALUE_ONLY
+ itupdesc = _create_hash_desc();
+#else
+ itupdesc = RelationGetDescr(rel);
+#endif
/*
* It should be okay to simultaneously write-lock pages from each bucket,
@@ -854,9 +859,13 @@ _hash_splitbucket(Relation rel,
itup = (IndexTuple) PageGetItem(opage, PageGetItemId(opage, ooffnum));
datum = index_getattr(itup, 1, itupdesc, &null);
Assert(!null);
-
+#ifdef HASHVALUE_ONLY
+ bucket = _hash_hashkey2bucket(DatumGetUInt32(datum),
+ maxbucket, highmask, lowmask);
+#else
bucket = _hash_hashkey2bucket(_hash_datum2hashkey(rel, datum),
maxbucket, highmask, lowmask);
+#endif
if (bucket == nbucket)
{
diff --git a/src/backend/access/hash/hashsearch.c b/src/backend/access/hash/hashsearch.c
index 258526b..5211e67 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/hash/hashsearch.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/hash/hashsearch.c
@@ -178,6 +178,7 @@ _hash_first(IndexScanDesc scan, ScanDirection dir)
hashkey = _hash_datum2hashkey_type(rel, cur->sk_argument,
cur->sk_subtype);
+ so->hashso_sk_hash = hashkey;
/*
* Acquire shared split lock so we can compute the target bucket safely
* (see README).
diff --git a/src/backend/access/hash/hashutil.c b/src/backend/access/hash/hashutil.c
index 41e2eef..81c6829 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/hash/hashutil.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/hash/hashutil.c
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@
#include "executor/execdebug.h"
#include "storage/bufmgr.h"
#include "utils/lsyscache.h"
-
+#include "catalog/pg_type.h"
/*
* _hash_checkqual -- does the index tuple satisfy the scan conditions?
@@ -28,16 +28,31 @@
bool
_hash_checkqual(IndexScanDesc scan, IndexTuple itup)
{
- TupleDesc tupdesc = RelationGetDescr(scan->indexRelation);
+ TupleDesc tupdesc;
ScanKey key = scan->keyData;
int scanKeySize = scan->numberOfKeys;
+ Datum datum;
+ bool isNull;
+ HashScanOpaque so = scan->opaque;
IncrIndexProcessed();
+#ifdef HASHVALUE_ONLY
+ tupdesc = _create_hash_desc();
+ datum = index_getattr(itup,
+ key->sk_attno,
+ tupdesc,
+ &isNull);
+ if( so->hashso_sk_hash != DatumGetUInt32(datum) )
+ return false;
+ key++;
+ scanKeySize--;
+#else
+ tupdesc = RelationGetDescr(scan->indexRelation);
+#endif
+
while (scanKeySize > 0)
{
- Datum datum;
- bool isNull;
Datum test;
datum = index_getattr(itup,
@@ -222,3 +237,31 @@ hashoptions(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
PG_RETURN_BYTEA_P(result);
PG_RETURN_NULL();
}
+
+/*
+ * _create_hash_desc - create a hash TupleDesc
+ *
+ * the TupleDesc is with int32 attribute, not uint32 because we've no pg_type with UINT4OID
+ */
+TupleDesc _create_hash_desc()
+{
+ TupleDesc tupdesc = CreateTemplateTupleDesc(1, false);
+ TupleDescInitEntry(tupdesc, 1, "hashcode", INT4OID, -1, 0);
+ return tupdesc;
+}
+
+/*
+ * _hash_form_tuple - form a tuple with hash code only
+ */
+IndexTuple _hash_form_tuple(Relation rel, Datum* values, bool* isnull)
+{
+ TupleDesc hashdesc;
+ IndexTuple itup;
+ uint32 hashkey;
+
+ hashdesc = _create_hash_desc();
+ hashkey = _hash_datum2hashkey(rel, values[0]);
+ values[0] = UInt32GetDatum(hashkey);
+ itup = index_form_tuple(hashdesc, values, isnull);
+ return itup;
+}
diff --git a/src/include/access/hash.h b/src/include/access/hash.h
index ab0824d..141f1fc 100644
--- a/src/include/access/hash.h
+++ b/src/include/access/hash.h
@@ -100,6 +100,8 @@ typedef struct HashScanOpaqueData
/* Current and marked position of the scan */
ItemPointerData hashso_curpos;
ItemPointerData hashso_mrkpos;
+ /* Hash value of the scan key */
+ uint32 hashso_sk_hash;
} HashScanOpaqueData;
typedef HashScanOpaqueData *HashScanOpaque;
@@ -227,6 +229,10 @@ typedef HashMetaPageData *HashMetaPage;
*/
#define HASHPROC 1
+/*
+ * store hash value only in the bucket
+ */
+#define HASHVALUE_ONLY
/* public routines */
@@ -330,6 +336,8 @@ extern Bucket _hash_hashkey2bucket(uint32 hashkey, uint32 maxbucket,
uint32 highmask, uint32 lowmask);
extern uint32 _hash_log2(uint32 num);
extern void _hash_checkpage(Relation rel, Buffer buf, int flags);
+extern TupleDesc _create_hash_desc();
+extern IndexTuple _hash_form_tuple(Relation rel, Datum* values, bool* isnull);
/* hash.c */
extern void hash_redo(XLogRecPtr lsn, XLogRecord *record);
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
