Hi, David Fetter wrote:
While I'm a "chicken" rather than a "pig" on this project <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Chicken_and_the_Pig>, I believe that covering the more general case right from the start would be a much better plan.
I was trying to say that Postgres-R internally relies only on a unique index with not null constraint. It doesn't care if you name it PRIMARY KEY or REPLICATION KEY or whatever.
So, it's just a question of the syntax. We already have PRIMARY KEYs, and those are pretty much what I think is needed in 99% of all cases as the pointer to the replication
While I'm normally an absolute fan of generality, I think you didn't quite get the point. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
