Teodor Sigaev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So, may be we just move insertcleanup call to
> ginbulkdelete/ginvacuumcleanup
> but leave aminsertcleanup field in pg_proc for a future.
I'd be inclined not to add the extra AM call if we aren't going to use
it now. There's no very good reason to think that a definition we
settled on today would be exactly the right thing for whatever future
need might appear. Better to wait till we have a concrete example to
design around.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
