On Fri, 2008-07-25 at 16:31 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Simon Riggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > On Tue, 2008-07-22 at 17:19 -0700, Martin Zaun wrote: > >> reviewing your patch > > > Current status is this: > > * My understanding is that Dave and Andrew (and therefore Simon) think > > the approach proposed here is an acceptable one. Heikki disagrees and > > wants different approach. Perhaps I misunderstand. > > * Patch needs work to complete the proposed approach > > * I'm willing to change the patch, but not able to test it on Windows. > > I thought the latest conclusion was that changing the behavior of > pg_standby itself wouldn't address the problem anyway, and that what we > need is just a docs patch recommending that people use safe copying > methods in their scripts that copy to the archive area?
Plus the rest of this patch, which is really very simple. pg_standby currently waits (on Windows) for the sleep time. We agreed that this sleep would be on by default, but optional. -- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
