Tom,

> Failover that actually works is not something we can provide with
> trivial changes to Postgres. 

I think the proposal was for an extremely simple "works 75% of the time" 
failover solution.  While I can see the attraction of that, the 
consequences of having failover *not* work are pretty severe.

On the other hand, we will need to deal with this for the built-in 
replication project.

-- 
--Josh

Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL
San Francisco

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to