Tom Lane napsal(a):
Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I wonder if we can do something diffie-hellman'ish, where we have a
parameter exchanged in the initial SSL'ed handshake, which is later used
to generate new cancel keys each time the previous one is used.
Seems like the risk of getting out of sync would outweigh any benefits.
Lose one cancel message in the network, you have no hope of getting any
more accepted.
When cancellation key is used client should explicitly ask for a new regenerated
cancel key.
Zdenek
--
Zdenek Kotala Sun Microsystems
Prague, Czech Republic http://sun.com/postgresql
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
