Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> BTW only now I notice that CLUSTER leaves the toast table name in bad
> shape: if you create a table with OID X its TOAST table is named
> pg_toast_X. If you then cluster this table, a new transient table gets
> created with OID Y; the TOAST table for Y is named pg_toast_Y, and then
> this new TOAST table is used as the new TOAST table for the original
> table X. So you end up with table OID X having TOAST table pg_toast_Y.
Hmm, we could probably fix that if we made the cluster operation swap
the physical storage of the two toast tables, rather than swapping the
tables altogether. I agree it's not critical but it could be confusing.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
