Am Monday, 18. August 2008 schrieb Tom Lane: > The impression I get every time this comes up is that various people > have different problems they want to solve that (they think) require > redesign of the way GUC works. Those complicated solutions arise from > attempting to satisfy N different demands simultaneously.
Which may be the reason that I have been getting the impression that the "Problems" and the proposed resolutions on http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/GUCS_Overhaul are not really closely related. I can agree with the Problems, but then I am lost. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
