Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Dave Page wrote: >> On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 4:40 AM, Joshua Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> I am not arguing for this but if we went down that route it does buy us >>> the ability to compartmentalize the entire conf.. so you have: >>> >>> memory_settings.conf >>> logging.conf >>> maintenance.conf >> Would make it damn hard for pgAdmin to figure out how to edit the >> config though. That's why we only support single-file configs atm. > > That's why we're working on adding a "sourcefile" attribute to GUC, so > that it's trivial to know the path of the config file each settings > comes from.
Still won't make life very easy for pgadmin, but it will make it slightly less difficult. That said, I think splitting the config out like that will mkae it even more confusing for the newbie user, which is contrary to what we want here. //Magnus -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
