Gregory Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hm, shouldn't this query notice that random() is volatile and not make the > subquery an initplan?
We've never done that in the past; in fact I recall seeing people using
subselects deliberately to hide volatility.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
