On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 11:18:24PM -0400, D'Arcy J.M. Cain wrote: > > I think it does -- I used to use the Latex output format for easy cut'n > > pasting. ReST sounds like it serves the same purpose. If I had had to > > use conversion to XML, it would have been rather painful. > > ReST is nice because it's almost plain text. In fact, a ReST document > source can easily be read raw.
I presume by ReST you mean this: http://docutils.sourceforge.net/rst.html Just guessing though. It's not referenced in wikipedia under that acronym. Have a nice day, -- Martijn van Oosterhout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://svana.org/kleptog/ > Please line up in a tree and maintain the heap invariant while > boarding. Thank you for flying nlogn airlines.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
