Tom Lane wrote:
"Matthew T. O'Connor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I think everyone agrees that partial vacuums would be useful / *A Good Thing* but it's the implementation that is the issue.

I'm not sure how important it will really be once we have support for
dead-space-map-driven vacuum.

Is that something we can expect any time soon? I haven't heard much about it really happening for 8.4.

--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to