"Steve Howe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> (Thinks for awhile...) You're not using PQsetnonblocking() are you, >> by any chance? > No, I'm not. Drat, another perfectly good theory down the drain :-(. Well, we're not going to find out anymore until we discover what the error code actually is --- the "errno=0" bogosity isn't helping. As Bruce mentioned, we did just commit a patch that #defines errno as WSAGetLastError() on WIN32, so that you can get at least something useful about socket errors. I'd suggest pulling the current CVS sources (or a nightly snapshot tarball dated after today) and building libpq from that. Then maybe we can learn more. regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
- [HACKERS] Large queries - again... Steve Howe
- [HACKERS] Re: Large queries - again... Eduardo Stern
- Re: [HACKERS] Large queries - again... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Large queries - again... Steve Howe
- Re: [HACKERS] Large queries - again... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Large queries - again... Steve Howe
- Re: [HACKERS] Large queries - again... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Large queries - again... Steve Howe
- Re: [HACKERS] Large queries - again... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Large queries - again... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Large queries - again... Steve Howe
- Re: [HACKERS] Large queries - again... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Large queries - again... Steve Howe
- Re: [HACKERS] Large queries - again... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Large queries - again... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Large queries - again... Jan Wieck
- Re: [HACKERS] Large queries - again... Steve Howe