Tom Lane wrote:
"Heikki Linnakangas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Note that the MemSetLoop macro used in palloc0fast is supposed to be evaluated at compile time,

Oooh, good point, I had forgotten about that little detail.  Yeah,
we'll lose that optimization if we move the code out-of-line.

Well, we could still have the MemSetTest outside the function, and evaluated at compile-time, if we provided an aligned and unaligned version of newNode:

#define newNode(size, tag) \
( \
        AssertMacro((size) >= sizeof(Node)),         /* need the tag, at least 
*/ \
        ( MemSetTest(0, sz) ? \
                newNodeAligned(CurrentMemoryContext, sz, tag) : \
                newNodeNotAligned(CurrentMemoryContext, sz, tag))

And if you're worried about the function call overhead, newNode(Not)Aligned could have the contents of MemoryContextAllocZero inlined into it. Not sure how much optimization is worthwhile here..

--
  Heikki Linnakangas
  EnterpriseDB   http://www.enterprisedb.com

--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to