Hello, Sorry for the new thread on this topic, I did not have a copy in my inbox I could replay to :(
I am not sure of the status of the patch, but I did read through the thread at: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2008-08/msg00054.php I just wanted to throw out another possible use for this GUC. There maybe a better way to solve this problem, but I believe this patch would be useful for regression testing. Here is the problem I ran into when regression testing the hash index on the unsigned integer type and how I could like to use the statement_cost_limit parameter: Regression testing steps: 1. Create the table: CREATE TABLE hash_i4_heap (seqno uint4, random uint4); 2. Create the hash index: CREATE INDEX hash_i4_index ON hash_i4_heap USING hash (random uint4_ops); 3. Load data into the hash_i4_heap table (data is from PostgreSQL regression suit). COPY hash_i4_heap FROM '/home/rbrad/src/PostgreSQL/src/test/regress/data/hash.data'; 4. Perform query: SELECT * FROM hash_i4_heap WHERE hash_i4_heap.random = 843938989; seqno | random -------+----------- 15 | 843938989 (1 row) This would pass the regression testing, but we did not actually test the hash index here: EXPLAIN SELECT * FROM hash_i4_heap WHERE hash_i4_heap.random = 843938989; QUERY PLAN -------------------------------------------------------------- Seq Scan on hash_i4_heap (cost=0.00..137.00 rows=1 width=8) Filter: (random = 843938989) (2 rows) 5. Attempt to force an index scan: SET enable_seqscan = off; EXPLAIN SELECT * FROM hash_i4_heap WHERE hash_i4_heap.random = 843938989; QUERY PLAN ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Seq Scan on hash_i4_heap (cost=100000000.00..100000137.00 rows=1 width=8) Filter: (random = 843938989) (2 rows) 6. Still uses an sequential scan. But this query would have still passed my regression tests. Try the statement_cost_limit: SET statement_cost_limit = 99999999; EXPLAIN SELECT * FROM hash_i4_heap WHERE hash_i4_heap.random = 843938989; ERROR: execution plan is too expensive: 100000137.000000 SELECT * FROM hash_i4_heap WHERE hash_i4_heap.random = 843938989; ERROR: execution plan is too expensive: 100000137.000000 7. This is good because finally, my regression test failed since the sequential scan cost bonus is larger then the statement_cost_limit. For those interested, the reason it failed to use the hash index is because I did not cast the hash_i4_heap.random value to an uint4 type. EXPLAIN SELECT * FROM hash_i4_heap WHERE hash_i4_heap.random = 843938989::uint4; QUERY PLAN ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Index Scan using hash_i4_index on hash_i4_heap (cost=0.00..8.27 rows=1 width=8) Index Cond: (random = '843938989'::uint4) (2 rows) The issue is fixed in my regression tests for the unsigned integer types, but it would be nice for the regression tests to fail in the future when the index is not used. I looked at how the main PostgreSQL regression tests handle this problem and as far as I can tell they do not. Maybe this is not a likely problem, but it seems we do not have a good way to ensure the indexes are actually being used during regression testing. Thanks, - Ryan P.S. There appears to be a bug in the statement_cost_limit1.patch: SET statement_cost_limit = 0; ERROR: 0 is outside the valid range for parameter "statement_cost_limit" (100 .. 2147483647)
