Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I have uploaded an example run here: > http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/coverage/ > > Current test coverage is about 66% overall.
With some pretty glaring gaps: 0% coverage of geqo, 0% coverage of logtape which implies no tuplesorts are spilling to disk, no coverage of mark/restore on index scans... -- Gregory Stark EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com Get trained by Bruce Momjian - ask me about EnterpriseDB's PostgreSQL training! -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
