Heikki Linnakangas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Tom Lane wrote: >> I didn't see anything that looked like an immediate change in user table >> contents, unless they used the "name" type; but what of relation forks? > > Relation forks didn't change anything inside relation files, so no scanning of > relations is required because of that. Neither will the FSM rewrite. Not sure > about DSM yet.
And just to confirm -- they don't change the name of the files the postmaster expects to find in its data directory, right? -- Gregory Stark EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com Ask me about EnterpriseDB's PostGIS support! -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
