On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 5:06 PM, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> The patch looks OK to me as it was the last time I looked at it; maybe >> Tom has more comments, so I decided against just committing it. > > I haven't got round to looking at it in this fest. If anyone else wants > to look it over, feel free. I think Josh is overrating the patch's > review difficulty --- anyone who uses libpq a lot could review it, > IMHO. You certainly wouldn't need any backend-internals knowledge. >
Josh is probably basing that on the long history of discussion/revision cycles. There is very little change from the design that was hammered out except for the late breaking tweak of how the passthru pointer works. I think the subtext here is that we are waiting on you to sign off on the patch (or not). merlin -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
