Simon Riggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Is it possible to have a FATAL error that crashes a backend and for it
> to *not* have written an abort WAL record for any previously active
> transaction?
Well, a FATAL error will still go through transaction abort before
exiting, IIRC. The problem case is a PANIC or an actual core dump.
> If we either *always* write a WAL record, or PANIC then that
> makes some coding easier,
Like what?
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
