Gregory Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> What we can do is keep a list of "not yet parsed WITH-names" in ParseState,
>> and check through that list when about to fail for relation-not-found, and
>> issue a suitable message hinting that maybe you forgot RECURSIVE if we find
>> a match.
> Perhaps it would be sufficient to just check if we're inside a non-recursive
> WITH without bothering to check if the name matches?
Even knowing that would require most of the same changes I made to do
the full nine yards, I think. The previous ParseState info didn't
record anything at all that would allow parserOpenTable to know that
a non-recursive WITH is being examined.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
