Hello 2008/10/9 Josh Berkus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > All, > > I was discussing WITH RECURSIVE the other day, and realized that one thing > which we're not getting with this patch is a simplest-case simple syntax > which 75% of users are looking for. You know, the ones with simple > proximity trees who just want to find all children of one parent. >
I thing so it's bad understanding of new syntax. It's really power and easy, but it minimally needs look to manual. I am against to add some non standard syntax, when we have standard. regards Pavel Stehule p.s. CONNECT by should help to people with migration of older application from DB2 or Oracle > Would it be a worth it for us to implement a non-standard simple syntax > sugar on top of WITH RECURSIVE? Or, at least, something like > CONNECT_BY()? > > -- > --Josh > > Josh Berkus > PostgreSQL > San Francisco > > -- > Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) > To make changes to your subscription: > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers > -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
