On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 12:05 PM, Greg Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Heikki had a clever idea earlier which was to have two crc checks- one which > skips the hint bits and one dedicated to hint bits. If the second doesn't > match we clear all the hint bits.
Sounds overcomplicated to me. > The problem with that is that skipping the hint bits for the main crc would > slow it down severely. It would make a lot of sense if the hint bits were > all in a contiguous block of memory but I can't see how to make that add up. Agreed. -- Jonah H. Harris, Senior DBA myYearbook.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
