BTW, while digging through my mail archives I discovered that Oliver
*did* already extract his "peer" auth patch and submit it as a proposed
patch --- see the pghackers archives for 3-May-2001. At the time I
think we were concerned about portability issues, but as long as it's
appropriately autoconf'd and documented, I see no real objection to
supporting SO_PEERCRED authentication.
I do still like Helge's API (use "ident") better than adding another
auth keyword, though.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
- [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] Allow IDENT authentication on local... Tom Lane
- [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] Allow IDENT authentication on ... Tom Lane
- [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] Allow IDENT authentication... Bruce Momjian
- [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] Allow IDENT authentication on ... Oliver Elphick
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] Allow IDENT authentica... Bruce Momjian
- [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] Allow IDENT authentication on ... Tom Lane
- [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] Allow IDENT authentication... Bruce Momjian
- [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] Allow IDENT authentication on ... Tom Lane
- [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] Allow IDENT authentication on ... Tom Lane
- [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] Allow IDENT authentication... Bruce Momjian
- [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] Allow IDENT authentication on ... Tom Lane
- [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] Allow IDENT authentication... Bruce Momjian
