Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Tom Lane wrote: >> Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>> AFAICT, removing an authentication method requires a protocol version >>> bump. >> >> Why would it require that? There would just be some auth method codes >> that remain reserved but aren't used anymore. > > Yeah, I was mistaken. AuthenticationCryptPassword would remain in the > protocol definition, but the server would just never send it.
Since I've seen no actual objections to this happening, I will go ahead and do it unless someone objects explicitly :-) //Magnus -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
