Gregory Stark wrote: > Simon Riggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I'm happy with the idea of a readahead process. I thought we were > > implementing a BackgroundReader process for other uses. Is that dead > > now? > > You and Bruce seem to keep resurrecting that idea. I've never liked it -- I > always hated that in Oracle and thought it was a terrible kludge.
I didn't think I was promoting the separate reader process after you had the posix_fadvise() idea. -- Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
