On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 11:19:15PM -0700, Jeff Davis wrote: > If there are potential problems with the standard > (where we don't want to implement a violation), we should just do > array_accum(). If not, we might as well do the standard array_agg(), > perhaps without the ORDER BY clause.
I've wanted an array_sort() function before; having this functionality as a separate function also seems considerably prettier than some ad hoc grammar, it also generalizes nicely to cases where the array isn't coming from an aggregate. Sam -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
