Tom Lane wrote: > Kris Jurka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Since we require every process to map the shared memory region to the same > > address, we don't need the MAKE_PTR/OFFSET code that was needed when that > > was not the case. This patch makes shared memory pointers just like > > regular pointers. > > Applied with minor editorialization --- mainly, I converted a couple of > "void *" pointer declarations to more specific types, since it seems to > me the main point of this is to not use nonspecific pointers > unnecessarily.
We now have two very similar doubly-linked list implementations. Should we take one of them out? -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
