Simon Riggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, 2008-11-03 at 23:28 +0000, Simon Riggs wrote: >> On Mon, 2008-11-03 at 17:37 -0500, Greg Stark wrote: >> >> > There are a lot of comments in the code which imply that vacuuming is >> > not implemented but in fact from what I can see it is -- sort of. It >> > does rewrite the bitmap in bmbulkdelete but it doesn't have to rebuild >> > the index from scratch. Are the comments out of date or am i >> > misunderstanding them or the code? How complete is the vacuum >> > implementation? >> >> As I understood it, complete. > > Looking at the code, it looks like my understanding was complete-ly > wrong and your comments seem accurate.
What I would appreciate is a README explaining how vacuum and vacuum full work. -- Gregory Stark EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com Ask me about EnterpriseDB's 24x7 Postgres support! -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
