Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> ... however, it seems reasonable to assume that the *new* tuple is just
>> local storage. Why don't you just poke the old tuple's OID into the new
>> one before comparing?
> OK, that will be easy enough. I assume I should still put InvalidOid
> back again afterwards, in case someone downstream relies on it.
Can't imagine what ...
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
