Tom Lane wrote: > Josh Berkus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Eh, Tom has a point. If we build module loading for 8.5, we shouldn't >> change the functionality in the interim for 8.4. Annoying as it is. > > The main reason I'm concerned about it is that when we do modules > (which I certainly hope happens for 8.5) we would then have two > different old behaviors to worry about compatibility with. > I'm afraid of painting ourselves into a corner.
I personally find the current way *very* annoying, because it keeps sticking things in public when I don't want to - yes, that's because I keep forgetting to edit the scripts, but it sucks that I should have to. But. I think this argument is a winner. *IF* we get modules, which we have been talking about for a long time, in the next version. But there seems to be more interest now than before, so I think the probability is better than it used to be ;-) Which means the argument for not creating "yet another way" wins in my book. //Magnus -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
