Jeff Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, 2008-11-01 at 16:38 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> There is an implicit AS ASSIGNMENT cast between the base type and the
>>> distinct
>>> type in each direction.
>>
>> Hmm ... so out-of-the-box, a distinct type would have no applicable
>> functions/operators whatsoever. You couldn't even create an index on
>> it. This seems a bit too impoverished to be useful. And given the
> I didn't have any problem creating and using an index on a distinct type
> at all.
[ scratches head... ] That should have failed, if the cast is really AS
ASSIGNMENT and not implicit. If it is implicit, how distinct is the type?
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
