> Based on the discussion so far, here is an attempt to flesh out the > details of what to do with OIDs for 7.2: > > 1. Add an optional clause "WITH OIDS" or "WITHOUT OIDS" to CREATE TABLE. > The default behavior will be WITH OIDS. What about having an additional Oid generator which solely serves for supplying user tables' per row Oids? It seems relatively easy to implement, comparing with 64-bit Oids or Oid-less tables. I assume that the Oid wraparound problem is not so serious with user tables. -- Tatsuo Ishii ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
- Re: [HACKERS] OID wraparound: summary and proposal Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] OID wraparound: summary and proposal Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] OID wraparound: summary and proposal Hiroshi Inoue
- Re: [HACKERS] OID wraparound: summary and proposal Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] OID wraparound: summary and proposal Hiroshi Inoue
- Re: [HACKERS] OID wraparound: summary and proposal Nathan Myers
- Re: [HACKERS] OID wraparound: summary and proposal Hannu Krosing
- Re: [HACKERS] OID wraparound: summary and proposal Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] OID wraparound: summary and proposal Hannu Krosing
- Re: [HACKERS] OID wraparound: summary and proposal Tatsuo Ishii
- Re: [HACKERS] OID wraparound: summary and proposal Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] OID wraparound: summary and proposal Hannu Krosing
- Re: [HACKERS] OID wraparound: summary and proposal Fernando Nasser
- Re: [HACKERS] OID wraparound: summary and proposal Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] OID wraparound: summary and proposal Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] OID wraparound: summary and proposal Fernando Nasser
- Re: [HACKERS] OID wraparound: summary and proposal Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] OID wraparound: summary and proposal Tatsuo Ishii