Re: [HACKERS] Notes about int8 sequences

[Tom Lane]

Matthew Kirkwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm not worried about the size of the return type of
> a sequence, but I like the idea of Oracle-compatible
> "seq.nextval" syntax.

I didn't realize we had any Oracle-compatibility issues here.  What
exactly does Oracle's sequence facility look like?

                        regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html