ITAGAKI Takahiro escreveu: [Sorry for the delay. I'm preparing the final patch and in a day or so I'll post it.]
> I have a comment about reloptions of autovacuum parameters: > I'd like to have an easier way to extract individual parameters. > > Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Euler Taveira de Oliveira wrote: >>> What did I already do? I refactored reloptions.c to support multiple >>> options. I tried to follow up the same way GUC do (of course, it is much >>> simpler). I'm thinking about removing (replacing?) StdRdOptions 'cause >>> we need a different struct to store reloptions. Suggestions? >> Interesting. > > We store reloptions as an array of 'key=value' text, but there is > no official way to read each parameter. I always create an user > defined function to extract fillfactors, but it would be better > if we have a standard method to do that. > We will have an official function (getRelOptions()?) to extract the reloption (autovacuum) parameters because we need to transform pg_autovacuum catalog table in a view to maintain backward compatibility. -- Euler Taveira de Oliveira http://www.timbira.com/ -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
