Tom Lane wrote:
"Robert Haas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Incidentally, I noticed while looking at this that "\h with" also
fails, even though WITH can now be the first word of a valid SQL
statement. I think we ought to patch psql to return the same help for
WITH as it does for SELECT.
Hmm. Given the current infrastructure for \h, the only way to do that
would be to make a separate ref page for WITH, which feels like the
wrong thing.
There is a canonical solution for this with man pages, namely man page
links (those ".so" things in a man page that redirect to a different
one). In DocBook, you just list more than one refname in the refentry
to create this. I have committed a few bits of makefile to support
this. A bit more Perl hacking should also get psql up to speed. I
suggest we try if we like the results when WITH is linked to SELECT, and
then see about TABLE and whatever else.
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
