Tom Lane wrote:
Andrew Chernow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
On the whole I vote for #4 out of these.
I attached a patch for the docs. Its documented as a NOTE to the
PGEventProc.
Applied, but I editorialized on the wording a bit. Let me know if you
think this is wrong ...
It's correct, the wording is clearer now. I wasn't aware there was a caution
tag, which is better than using <note>.
--
Andrew Chernow
eSilo, LLC
every bit counts
http://www.esilo.com/
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
