Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Is a one-off cost per connection of 100ms so bothersome?
I think the complaint is that there's no obvious reason for it to be so high. On my Fedora 9 machine, the overhead to start plperl seems to be about 40 msec. This compares unfavorably to the time to start perl from the command line, which is under 4 msec. I see that /usr/bin/perl pulls in libperl.so, so it's paying the same shlib overhead as we do. How is it that we take ten times longer to start up? regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers