On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 2:14 PM, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "Dave Page" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 1:53 PM, Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> No, there is no need to clutter every installation in the world with such a >>> database. You could make it an addon module, or a pgfoundry project. > >> That would defeat the point. > > By that logic, we should install the sample stuff in template1, to > ensure that the examples would "just work" wherever $newbie tries > to execute them :-(
*sigh*. Or one of us could visit their office and show them what to do, but I think we know the difference between making something usable out of the box and going overboard. -- Dave Page EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
